Anyone who has ever said they cannot dance should be eating their words because when I see the hundreds or thousands of people that take part in viral dance videos online I know that there ARE moves simple enough for anyone to learn and fun enough to make everyone get up and dance! From Gagnum Style , to the Dougie , to the Harlem Shake (which I still don't technically consider a real dance), these videos have gone viral for a reason, and that is because everyone can join in the fun of doing them. What a great ice breaker and way to feel connected to people on the dance floor or around the world!
For my seminar class, a friend and I decided to participate in remix culture and create a comedic youtube video on the topic of viral dance videos. Please check out our video. Hope it makes you want to get up and dance!!
Just a Citizen in a World of Media
A look into the online public sphere today: how nobody's become somebody's.
Friday 5 April 2013
Wednesday 3 April 2013
ALIASupport: Last but not least, we'd like to thank social media
ALIASupport |
Today I want to talk about a recent event in my life that
caused my own true realization of how incredibly powerful participatory media is. I will share with you the story that has
taken place over the last few weeks of my life and you will come to better understand
my newfound passion and appreciation.
I am a proud member of a truly inspiring hip hop dance team
at Wilfrid Laurier University that is called ALIAS. Our name stands for, A Legacy to Inspire Achieve & Share.
We only formed as a group in September and have since competed in two reputable
university wide competitions: OUCH & BYOB . We did extremely well at
both competitions, however, to me our placement does not matter, which is why,
despite our overall success, I am leaving that information out of this post.
The section of this story I would like to dwell on is specifically related to
support, but not just any support, support through participatory media.
Approximately a mere week before we competed at BYOB 2013 on
March 30th, our choreographer and mentor came up with the incredible
idea of ALIASupport. The idea behind this was to use our ALIAS hand symbol (which spells out ALIAS) in order to raise
awareness of our team, our drive and genuine intentions to inspire, achieve and
share in the dance community and beyond; most importantly, though, to get
people in our community that knew about us to personally get involved in
showing their individual support through taking a picture of themselves doing
our hand symbol with a blurb about themselves. They were then to post their
support on our ALIASupport page on Facebook for everyone to see.
The support that started to rapidly roll in after this was
launched was unbelievable! By the end of the week we had received over 100 pictures!!! In the dance
community, especially in the small Waterloo dance community, that is AMAZING.
Moreover, when individuals and teams from other schools outside of Waterloo
started taking part in this, it was most inspiring, as we understood this was a
real movement that had affected more people than we ever thought it would. As
sentimental and emotional as the thought of this makes me, reflecting back now,
I recognize that this would have been impossible without the magic of the
Internet and social media. The opportunities granted to us thanks to technology
are truly remarkable. Moreover, the ability to motivate action offline, such as
taking a picture individually or with a group, in order to support a cause you
believe in or in order to feel like a part of something bigger by contributing
something so simple goes to show us how people feed off of that online connection to others - be it around
small town Waterloo or around the globe. The online public sphere and global
village connects us on a level we had never known prior to social media. It
allows for the cultivation of movements that have the ability to make a real
small or large scale impact as a result of speed, ease of use and personal connections.
Having said this, I realize it is necessary for me to thank
not just all of our contributing ALIASupporters but social media for making
this support movement possible. We couldn’t have done it without you.
Monday 25 March 2013
*Seeing WAS Believing: Breeding a Generation of Skeptics
Seeing is believing…. Or so that is the way it has always
been in the past. Today, however, in an age of mechanical manipulation, our
once most trusted sense has severely declined in worth.
The question plaguing this technological generation has
become:
Can we really believe
anything we see?
Is visual evidence today even worth anything considering how
easily it can be altered? As a result of the incredible advanced technologies
that exist today, manipulations can be so convincing that there is no way for
the average person to recognize it has been changed in any way. Take for example the baby-snatching
eagle video that went viral. Only after receiving millions of hits did
skeptics debunk the
hoax that this video really was.
There are tons of examples like these seeing as the average
person has access to devices, such as Photoshop, and 3D animation programs,
necessary to engage in these kinds of manipulations. I took a seminar class in
my previous semester (CS402 with Professor Finn) dedicated strictly to the
topic of visual evidence. The existence of such a course in itself is proof
that this is a topic worthy of some serious consideration.
In a world where citizens are an integral part of media and
what makes headlines, there is often public outrage when they find out they are
deliberately duped for the amusement of others. An additional example of an
occurrence like this was with Lonelygirl15. Unsuspecting audiences everywhere were
fooled into buying into the seemingly innocent reality of this bored, goofy
girl’s vlog only to find out she had an entire production crew behind the
making of it and she was just an actress. Reactions to this ranged from
disappointment to downright anger.
This goes to show that as much as we know we have to be
cautious about what we believe on the Internet many people do still believe
much of what they see and they expect personal blogs and vlogs to be genuine
and truthful. Seeing as Lonelygirl15 is several years old now, I wonder if this
has taught Internet users that anything from pictures to written blogs to
personal youtube videos that appear genuine can potentially be frauds.
So…. If we can believe what we read, hear or see… what can
we believe?
Looks like modernity is breeding a generation of skeptics.....
Tuesday 12 March 2013
The New Fan-Artist Relationship
My previous blog post (hyperlink
essay) focused on the increasingly well known organization TED , yet I did not actually link to any specific
TEDtalk. Therefore, this week I have decided to discuss one talk that assists
in furthering the arguments set forth in my previous post related to the
incredible opportunities the internet provides us with.
The talk I have selected to bring
to your attention is entitled The
Art of Asking , and it was presented by a female artist in the music
industry named Amanda
Palmer . Palmer discusses a
creative idea that, prior to the age of the Internet, would have NEVER come to
fruition. Concisely, Palmer discusses the unbelievable experiences and support
she has managed to receive from her fans all purely thanks to social media and
the affordances of the Internet itself. The web is essentially responsible for
her continued career. Palmer’s record label dropped her band before it produced
a record, therefore, she wouldn’t have been able to share her music with others
without the Internet. The Internet enabled her with the ability to share her
music technically for free. The
reason I say technically for free is
because despite the fact that anyone could download her stuff for free, Palmer requested that her fans make donations
for the music. So instead of insisting her fans pay a set amount, this system allowed
them to pay what they wanted for her songs- a concept which reminds me a lot of
the idea of our new gift
economy.
Regardless, in doing this Palmer
was able to earn $1.2 million via Kickstarter
from approximately 25 000 fans that preordered her album. This is the power of fan
culture. Artists produce art for them,
therefore, especially in today’s global
village they should be entitled to a say in this relationship between what
they give and receive – Palmer provided them with this voice.
The fact that Palmer could be so
successful in making money this way opens doors to a whole other way for
struggling artists in the deteriorating music industry to make money. This
notion of asking for donations to help proliferate the music and support the
artist is fantastic. It embraces change rather than trying to fight it. Most
importantly though, fans really feel like they are consciously, actively
supporting the art of an artist they love.
Thursday 28 February 2013
The Technological Affordance of the Internet: Recognizing the Power of Participation
All technologies have affordances. Anything from guns
to email to blogs are created with a purpose, one which has a powerful
psychological effect on us since it provides us with a behaviour option we previously
lacked. These technological affordances have created a shift in the way
individuals participate in society and, therefore, how society functions as a
whole. Looking at several examples, while using TED as my primary one, I will convey
how the affordance of the Internet has transformed our thinking and provided us with the recognized ability to have our voices heard in this interconnected global
village and stimulate change
like never before.
Before delving into how TED
assists in facilitating such change, it is necessary to acknowledge several important
features of the Internet. To begin, we must recognize how ANYONE has the ability
to communicate to the masses today. New technology, specifically social media,
require participation. The “web” or "net" cannot
function without it (hence the name). Whether participation be through Youtube,
blogs, Twitter, Facebook… individuals can communicate to an unlimited audience.
In principle, “‘anyone’ or ‘everyone’” is able to be a journalist today.
There need not be a reliance or sole trust in news media anymore. This is what participatory media
is about. Through engagement in this realm, citizens acquire skills needed to
be a part of what Henry Jenkins’
calls participatory
democracy.
The logic behind this is, with skills
acquired through participatory
media, such as fan culture creations, like Star Wars remakes, people can creatively
speak up and gain attention in social and political arenas. For example, look
at the viral protest mashup, George
Bush Don't Like Black People, produced after hurricane Katrina in an effort
to raise an important political issue relating to race. Similarly, TED,
using the reputation it has built online, utilizes the Internet as a tool to
find “ideas worth spreading” and raise awareness of them. TED talks happen live, but they all get posted on Youtube and their
website, allowing it to reach countless more people. There are an abundance of insightful
voices and messages floating around the Internet; TED acts as a filter for
these.
Clearly, the public
sphere Habermas spoke
of has moved from the coffee house to the computer. The new public sphere (and blogosphere) offers greater
equality since participation is not limited to the bourgeoisie. It embraces a gift
economy in which we , as equal creators, all give our creative or
intellectual work (such as music covers or political views) away for free in
exchange for the work of others. Monetary exchanges are being replaced by
information and entertainment.
So how do these affordances
change the way we think and act? From the aforementioned examples, I would
argue that people actually believe they can make a difference today. They have
the unique ability to be heard free of charge. TED was built on that core idea.
Their purpose being to filter and promote ideas they believe should go viral. Everyday
there are new viral videos or articles, often short lived, such as Kony 2012, but
nonetheless, public attention grabbers. Evidently, the Internet creates a world
of possibility; One in which ordinary people can create and stimulate change. That’s
the technological affordance of the Internet. You don’t need to be the
President, or a movie star to get heard. All you need is the Internet… and
maybe a Youtube account.
The world is at your fingertips. |
Monday 18 February 2013
“Um… Do I know you?” Part 2: Social Suffering
Social media, this word
leads me to the assumption that those that are highly engaged in social media
are, additionally, quite social in real life. Turns out, however, that there is
a difference between social skills and
social media skills.
In my last blog post I discussed
the issue of Facebook Friends versus real life friends and how a single person
can have two completely different personalities online and face-to-face.
Stemming from that slightly frustrating discussion, were thoughts related to
interpersonal abilities of people growing up in this age of technology. In
pondering this I was overcome with concern for the generations succeeding mine
whose social skills could potentially be drastically altered with the increased
communication via technology as opposed to in person. Studies
have already begun discovering evidence of the hindering of social skills in
children growing up with new technologies. As I’ve mentioned, many of my own
experiences have come to support this evidence as well, and clearly so have other
bloggers.
There
are so many skills we gain from interacting with people in person, from picking
up non-verbal cues such as body language, tone of voice, eye contact, etc. that
I fear for the ability of individuals to develop the same types of
relationships in real life that they have online. Online relationships deceive
us into believing we are more social, and socially competent than we truly are.
Relationships online, however, are “shallow” and often “superficial”.
Yet the trend in social relationship building appears to be on the rise. Perhaps
close friendships in the physical world won’t be as valuable in the years to
come seeing as one can simply vent their feelings in a method “akin to diary
writing” as suggested by Danah Boyd in her article “Blogging Outloud:
Shifts in Public Voice” as opposed to spilling their feelings to their friends
in search of advice. Moreover, if
they do so, these people can get seemingly honest, true, emotional (yet sometimes
harsh) advice from readers’ responses.
Can this ‘diary writing’ be a
real substitute for human interaction though? Will face-to-face social skills sink on a level of importance in
relation to an ability to cultivate mediated relationships? Are computers man's
new best friend?
Good news is at least writing
skills should improve! Rite? Right? Write? Well, at least we’ll have spell
check and online dictionaries … hopefully pens and paper will become extinct and
computers will be allowed in exam rooms, otherwise I wouldn’t want to be the
teacher marking those essays…
Friday 15 February 2013
Um... Do I Know You?
Media mediates our everyday lives. I believe we can all
agree to that. That, however, is not entirely the topic of concern for me
today. The topic I will be delving into revolves around the vastly different
impressions people often make in live interactions versus interactions over
some form of mediating technology (be it Facebook, Twitter , texting, email,
etc.).
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT PEOPLE ARE SO DIFFERENT?
Does a simple screen give a
person that much courage?
Who is the real self behind
the screen?
The majority of the time it appears that people have a
serious personality (& confidence) boost when communicating through their
technology. Not only are they more talkative, but they are also often funny and
much more likely to request a get together in person. Is this why dating sites are so successful? - Because people feel
they can show their 'best' selves (minus the nerves and stress of having to
wonder if the other person accept or reject an invitation to get together) this
way? But and here's the big but--- IS that their true self? Maybe it is
their wittiest self because they have time to construct the perfect responses
thanks to the backspace button, but, again, is that their true self? I have
encountered MANY instances in which people via text or Facebook chat were
seemingly extremely charismatic and not shy in the least, but upon getting
together with them in person they become someone COMPLETELY different. A person
I have never met before. Sometimes I wonder if they realize that? I say this
because a day after getting together with them their technologically mediated
conversations continue to be the exact same, as if they didn't just reveal
their true colours in person.
So my big question resulting from this is- are media helping or hindering social
relationships? They seemingly have
the potential to help them. For example, I understand for the boys it is especially
hard to ask a girl out in person and the blow is much less powerful when it is
felt through a screen. Realistically, though, who wants to expect to meet the
person they've been talking to online or via text and then end up getting
together with a familiar stranger? This is an instance where the
miscommunication does not lay within the wording, but rather in their social
skills, in their ability to hold up a conversation in person. Look at Facebook
friends for an easy example of people behaving as though their relationships
with certain friends are much more intimate than they truly are. Truth be told,
we all have friends we view purely as our 'Facebook Friends;' those people we
really only interact with through that platform. The typical reason for this
being because in real life things just don't click as nicely. Are Facebook
friends real friends though? Do they fulfill the needs of a live friendship or
are you essentially just talking to your computer?
Would love to hear some opinions on this :)
Thanks for reading!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)